Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW July 18th, 2005
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Tue Jul 19 02:29:26 2005

Isn't there a simple rule that says: the more grapic/simple the image is,
the smaller you can reproduce it, the more complex, the bigger?
Unless you print it really really big: then almost everything works: do a 2
to 1 metyer of your old favorite, and I'm pretty sure it will work.


> From: feli <feli2@earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:23:32 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] PAW July 18th, 2005
> 
> Two new ones
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/89gtu
> 
> 
> I'm torn about the first one. I really wish I had tilted the camera
> down a
> tad more and caught his legs better. Maybe even added a little dutch.
> 
> Ever notice how some shots have to be printed a certain size to work?
> For some reason "cafe II" falls apart at anything less than full
> screen on a
> 19 inch monitor. Then it looks like she is looking out of this
> picture window,
> beyond the cafe.
> 
> On the other hand I have shots that only work when they are printed
> small;
> no larger than 8x10. Like this one, which is an old favorite of mine.
> Looks great at 8x10 and like hell at 11x14... http://tinyurl.com/9z4r2
> 
> Love that collapsible Cron, by the way. Without a doubt it's not as
> sharp as the
> later incarnations of the Cron, but it really glows.
> 
> Feli
> ________________________________________________________
> feli2@earthlink.net                 2 + 2 = 4
> www.elanphotos.com
> 
> 
> NO ARCHIVE
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>