Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/07/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?
From: lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda)
Date: Thu Jul 21 09:17:49 2005
References: <9b678e05072108206cbe192b@mail.gmail.com> <69ADBDB6-EC2F-4F50-838A-AB73F862FC65@earthlink.net> <38aee5342031c1121cdd290e3701fc26@interlink.es> <6C057F63-C15A-41A3-9317-18CB7DF0083F@earthlink.net>
On 21 de jul de 2005, at 18:12, feli wrote:
> But it does raise a question. What is the closest thing to Tri-X?
As I didn't liked the latest changes in the Tri-X, I tried HP5+ with
good results, the grain structure is somewhat different, but there is
not a big change as more modern emulsions as Delta o Tmax.
Saludos
-----------------------------------------
http://imaginarymagnitude.net/blog/
In reply to:
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?)