Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] the best M body ...
From: summarex at hotmail.com (Javier Perez)
Date: Wed Aug 3 06:29:17 2005
 
Yeah!
That's the common wisdom and it's a bunch of crap. The M3 has a different RF 
than the M2 and M4. It's longer in base but not better built. The camera is 
no better either. Also, gripes about the M4-2 and later cameras are crap as 
well. Get the best value M. That would be the M2 followed by the M3
Javier


>I'm curious...but never used an M3...
>
>Leica M3...?  the best built M body ever  ?   with the best  viewfinder of 
>all ?
>
>is this the common wisdom?
>
>is it true?
>
>other pro's/cons?
>
>other thoughts, or considerations about the best M3 of all  ?
>
>anyone care to compare, especially to  M5, M6 M7  ....
>
>
>Steve
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] the best M body ...)
 In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] the best M body ...)