Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]it is the 135/2 lens and not 2.8 soft focus one On 8/10/05, Eric <ericm@pobox.com> wrote: > > http://www.outbackphoto.com/reviews/equipment/leica_dmr/leica_dmr.html > > > The Leica R9 with DMR costs about the same as a Canon 1Ds Mk. II. Also > > the DMR 10MP are not that way off from the 16MP of the 1Ds2. We > > photographed a brick wall with two top lenses that are highly rated at > > photodo.com (both lenses are rated at 4.5, that is nearly as good as > > it gets). > > > > * Leica R9 + DMR + APO Macro Elmarit R 100mm f/2.8 > > * Canon 1Ds Mk. II + Canon 135mm f/2 8, we think this is our > > sharpest lens) > > > As you can see the 1Ds Mk. II provides quite a bit more detail to work > > with. > > In any case we most of the time we would be happy with the DMR > > resolution. > > Either this is a misprint, or they're under a misconception. The 135/2.8 > lens by Canon isn't in the same league as the 100/2.8 Elmarit. It's rated > 3.9 at photodo. > > If this is, indeed, the lens they used, it speaks volumes of the Canon. > $340 Canon lens vs $3400 Leica lens, and they see more detail from the > Canon > one. > > If this is a misprint and they used the 135/2 lens, it still says > something. > $900 Canon lens still beats $3400 Leica lens. > > -- > Eric > http://canid.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad