Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR
From: Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway)
Date: Thu Aug 11 12:28:44 2005
References: <1f4.f8f33d7.302cb18c@aol.com><021101c59e80$8609aa30$0400a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <FCC14580-FE25-4C8B-B8F6-A70F1F59EE76@earthlink.net> <023b01c59e8f$7afe5f50$0400a8c0@robertbxucevjs>

I haven't found it worthwhile to shoot anything in jpeg if there's much 
contrast in the scene.

Jim

Robert Meier wrote:

> Yes, you're right.   They say this on a later page:
> "Using Adobe Camera RAW 2.4 to convert RAW images from both cameras the 
> differences between the two are much less, you would be very hard pushed 
> to find any more detail in the EOS 300D image (which we couldn't 
> attribute to its slightly higher vertical pixel count). Further evidence 
> if any where needed that the *ist DS can produce great images, but only 
> if you shoot RAW. "
> 
>>
>> Don't they say that the Pentax jpgs out of the camera are a touch  
>> soft, but when
>> generated from the a RAW file are very sharp?
>>
>>
>> feli
>>



In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR)