Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW August 23, 2005
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Aug 14 12:09:44 2005
References: <7067A442-75DB-4E08-87A4-C161E5AF57CF@earthlink.net> <007b01c5a102$948cf740$0dfb4d51@desktop>

On Aug 14, 2005, at 12:01 PM, GeeBee wrote:

> From: "feli" <feli2@earthlink.net>
>
> Subject: [Leica] PAW August 23, 2005
>
>
>
>> Five new ones.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/7fduh
>>
>> As always comments and criticism is much appreciated.
> Feli
>
> After reading the explanation of your fascination with mannequins  
> (an object
> lesson in clarity BTW) I find the perfect example in the third shot  
> of this
> sequence. I really feel as if I learned something from this shot  
> coupled
> with your explanation. Thank you.
>
> --Graham

feli.... sometimes I feel that the headless mannequins may be used  
as  a metaphor for certain people in LA....  I am absolutely sure  
that this is grossly unfair,  so I thought I'd mention it... just to  
dispell the thought....

Steve


In reply to: Message from geebee at geebeephoto.com (GeeBee) ([Leica] PAW August 23, 2005)