Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Fri Sep 2 16:18:52 2005
References: <440b792d05090215522e6f5243@mail.gmail.com> <BF3EA630.53E3%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>

this is only for opening raw files in c1 and using the etc profiles
rather the the generic c1 profiles.

On 9/2/05, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote:
> Is that the same as the built in RAW conversion for different cameras of PS
> CS? Or is it rather as attributing a color profile when opening the new 
> file
> converted from RAW in PS CS? Or is this just an additional function in
> Capture One? I never worked with the latter myself, that's why I ask.
> 
> 
> > From: mehrdad <msadat@gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:52:05 -0700
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII
> >
> > this company has created specific profiles to use with capture one
> > software (c1). these are   specific profiles for a particular camera,
> > the theory behind it is just like using a paper profile for a desk jet
> > printers. i use profiles for my printing all the time and it makes a
> > big difference, though i have not used anything for digi cameras
> >
> > On 9/2/05, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote:
> >> Somewhere they're talking about changing the camera profile (they refer 
> >> to
> >> http://etcetera.cc/pub/index.php/article/frontpage/1). What do they mean
> >> with that? Can anybody explain this (a bit) plz?
> >>
> >>
> >>> From: Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com>
> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> >>> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 17:56:38 -0400
> >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII
> >>>
> >>> sorry if this is a repeat, but have you seen the LONG thread over on
> >>> fredmiranda.com <http://fredmiranda.com>?
> >>>
> >>> spend a few hours reading it..
> >>> http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/267995/0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Eric
> >>>
> >>> On 9/2/05, F?lix L?pez de Maturana <FELIXMATURANA@telefonica.net> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> This is the most comprehensive test but not scientific at all I've 
> >>>> read
> >>>> up to now. Just a small problem : it's in Spanish
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://www.macuarium.com/cms/macu/pruebas/el-modulo-digital-r-de-leica.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Felix
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >   -------------------------------------
> >   regards, mehrdad
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII)
In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Test DMR vs EOS 1DsMkII)