Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Motion picture film
From: dlridings at gmail.com (dlridings@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 30 06:47:10 2005
References: <2ead44e4d21140062829952312c3d6d5@cshore.com> <433CB2B6.1060302@hemenway.com> <009201c5c571$2ec27780$6401a8c0@opportunity> <47850DA3-1E0B-4A36-8CF2-3F2F0D17A1D0@earthlink.net> <001801c5c5c2$51e5f740$6401a8c0@opportunity> <a2f8f447050930062663610398@mail.gmail.com> <002201c5c5c4$82191170$6401a8c0@opportunity>
 
Yes, I thought the same thing as I wrote. No big deal anymore (as long
as we scan).

Daniel

On 9/30/05, Lew <lew@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I'm thinking that since I scan everything I like, the fading doesn't really
> matter as much as it used to.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <dlridings@gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 9:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Motion picture film
>
>
> > But them must have been in business for years. I have boxes of slides
> > from the 70'ies that I think were processed by them (slides are all
> > faded now. I wouldn't use respooled motion picture film).
> >
> > Daniel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (Douglas Nygren) ([Leica] Where New Haven is)
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Where New Haven is)
Message from lew at fastmail.fm (Lew) ([Leica] Motion picture film)
Message from lew at fastmail.fm (Lew) ([Leica] Motion picture film)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (dlridings@gmail.com) ([Leica] Motion picture film)
Message from lew at fastmail.fm (Lew) ([Leica] Motion picture film)