Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] TidBits: Digital Better than Film
From: lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda)
Date: Tue Dec 13 00:54:08 2005
References: <4cfa589b0512122340y422edeefu886df66dd0c960a4@mail.gmail.com>

On 13/12/2005, at 8:40, Adam Bridge wrote:

> Here's a link to an essay demonstrating why digital is better than  
> film.

using that way you can demonstrate anything, just populate a sheet  
with techy gibberish and redefine better to suit your goals.

My conclusion:
a) You're nobody without a digital camera, they are the holy grail  
and the philosopher's stone combined.
b) Don't matter how crap you do it even representing it in your brain  
tissue, you can fix it later.
c) [ and most important ] buy photoshop
d) buy photoshop now, just in case that c) conclussion wasn't clear  
enough.

:-)

Now seriously: this article has interesting points, but... aren't we  
bored to death of those endless arguments in both ways? :)

Replies: Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] TidBits: Digital Better than Film)
In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] TidBits: Digital Better than Film)