Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Much nicer. Looks better than what I could get with the "usual" 1600. Daniel On 1/3/06, SonC@aol.com <SonC@aol.com> wrote: > As promised, I have had time to rescan this picture, and I think it does > the > moment more justice now. This is my first experience with Fuji Natura > 1600. > It behaves much more like Fuji 800 than the old 1600. Still has a good > deal of grain, but doesn't clump up on scanning like the other does. > > Natura is not imported to the US, I got mine from > http://www.unicircuits.com/shop/ in Japan. I was surprised when I got a > return email upon my order, > asking if I was related to Sonny Carter in Natchitoches, LA. It seems > that > Dirk, the owner of the shop and I had been on another list at the same > time. > > http://www.unicircuits.com/shop/ > > > Anyhow, here's the picture, made with available light using a Noctilux at > F1 > > This was scanned on my Nikon Coolscan 5000 > http://www.sonc.com/at-the-gospel.htm > > This is the earlier scan from Walgreens: > > http://www.sonc.com/at_the_gospel.jpg > > > Regards, > Sonny > http://www.sonc.com > Natchitoches, Louisiana > Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane > ?galit?, libert?, crawfish > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >