Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: [rollei_list] Re: Leica Sold ! ? !
From: cochranpr at mac.com (David Cochran)
Date: Tue Jan 3 16:48:49 2006
References: <69408340-99D1-4521-B7A0-1970CF3E0843@btinternet.com> <BAY103-F22EF64C50E3811CEE307FAC72C0@phx.gbl> <6.1.0.6.2.20060103131052.121ba720@192.168.100.42>

je je je je je je  :-)


D.


On Jan 3, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Richard wrote:

> It means that the LUG has the distinction (probably again, 
> unfortunately) of being the most chatty of all Leica lists on non 
> subjects.
>
> At 01:05 PM 1/3/2006, Javier Perez wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I just spoke to someone at leica and he/she said, and I quote
>>
>> "No Canon did not buy us"
>>
>> I wonder what that means? :)
>>
>> Javier
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from summarex at hotmail.com (Javier Perez) ([Leica] RE: [rollei_list] Re: Leica Sold ! ? !)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] RE: [rollei_list] Re: Leica Sold ! ? !)