Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks to everyone who has responded to my question, both on and off list. I think that after the conflicting information and also what Dan says below, I may just give it a go, as they say "nothing ventured, nothing gained". Cheers and thanks to all who have responded once again. Eric ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan States" <dstate1@hotmail.com> To: <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:58 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] Tri-Elmar Question >I should add that my situation could well have been unique to a certain run >of production. The fact that it no longer comes up leads me to believe >Leica has solved this issue. Mine was the original version, not the new >type. > > Dan > > >>From: EricC <eric.calderwood@btinternet.com> >>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >>To: "Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>" <lug@leica-users.org> >>Subject: [Leica] Tri-Elmar Question >>Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:48:40 +0000 >> >>I have the opportunity to buy the latest version Tri-Elmar used. >>However, on looking back through the archives I see that there have been >>problems with regards to flare, especially at the 50mm setting. >> >>Does anyone, or more specifically, any Tri-Elmar owner on the group have >>any >>information with regards to the above? Or am I just worrying about a >>couple >>of isolated incidents? >> >>If I remember correctly the two people who had the problems with their >>lenses were Alastair Firkin and Dan States. >> >> >>Cheers >>Eric >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information