Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] CLE... ?
From: buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner)
Date: Fri Jan 20 18:20:24 2006

Just thinking about a CL (which I owned and really tried to love) or CLE
(with which I merely dallied) brings my rage to the surface.  Both cameras
are utter pooches for reasons upon which I will not here elaborate.  See my
comments in the archives.

Talk to you later, B.D.

        Buzz


On 1/20/06 9:15 PM, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote:

> Sir Buzz of Belmont! Good to hear from you this evening! :-)
> 
> 
> On 1/20/06 8:39 PM, "Buzz Hausner" <buzz.hausner@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
>> Bow wow.
>> 
>>     Buzz Hausner
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/20/06 8:36 PM, "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have been intrigued by a Minolta CLE body...a mint specimen,
>>> almost enough to buy it...
>>> 
>>> but I am concerned re its usefulness for an M shooter, it non-
>>> compatability with certain M lenses, and in the event of a failure...
>>> 
>>> trying to get it repaired, especially its electronic circuit board...
>>> 
>>> your thoughts? yeh or neh..?
>>> 
>>> thanks,  Steve 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] CLE... ?)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] CLE... ?)