Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Advice wanted: TRI-X development setup
From: lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth)
Date: Fri Jan 27 14:37:42 2006
 
Xtol 1:3 has worked for several hundreds of rolls of Tri-X for me - all
scanned with Nikon and Minolta scanners.

Steve
 

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: 27 January 2006 22:26
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Advice wanted: TRI-X development setup

You are in exactly the same situation that I was in several years ago. I
tried XTOL (1:1) many times as it seemed to be the hands-down favorite among
B&W shooters. I couldn't get good, scannable negatives.

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 27/01/2006
Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Advice wanted: TRI-X development setup)
 In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Advice wanted: TRI-X development setup)