Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Nuclear power (was RE: LUG Digest, Vol 31, Issue 221)
From: jblack at ambio.net (John Black)
Date: Thu Feb 2 09:49:01 2006
References: <200602021639.k12Gc75D031645@server1.waverley.reid.org> <fededdd5839708ceec785fb29002969a@shaw.ca>


> Some of the past and present solutions to this waste seem inadequate
> and short sighted.
> Others are more credible, but considering the consequences of mistakes,
> I remain skeptical
> and would prefer development of other options.
>

What ever happened to the process of burning the waste in a plasma furnace
that converts it to harmless byproducts? As I understand it, plasma
temperatures completely disrupt the atomic structure of the radioactive
waste (or anything for that matter) into a high energy soup of subatomic
particles which, when cooled, revert to more harmless substances.  I know it
take a lot of temperature to run a plasma furnace but the bulk of the waste
is not that great.

Perhaps I misunderstood the process.

JB (who lives downwind of Oak Ridge)




Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Re: Nuclear power (was RE: LUG Digest, Vol 31, Issue 221))
In reply to: Message from bruent at shaw.ca (Bruce) ([Leica] Re: Nuclear power (was RE: LUG Digest, Vol 31, Issue 221))