Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Mon Feb 6 13:57:37 2006
References: <C00BEFE1.3F25%telyt@earthlink.net>

I would have thought that good, powerful photography would be the standard 
to aim for.
And it can be achieved without ISO 1600.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Douglas Herr" <telyt@earthlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?


> on 2/5/06 5:25 PM, EPL at manolito@videotron.ca wrote:
>
>> What, is there less light today than when Smith did Minamata (don't start 
>> up
>> on that one please)? Are lenses today slower than Salomon's Ermanox? Or 
>> are
>> we merely indulging in too much Lagavulin, ladies and gentlemen, to hold 
>> our
>> do-everything Gizmoflexes steady anymore?
>
> Standards have changed, boundaries have been stretched and there's no 
> going
> back.
>
> --
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


Replies: Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)