Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA
From: nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts)
Date: Sat Feb 11 02:10:58 2006

My favourite is Delta 3200 in TMax dev. Very nice
indeed.

Nick

--- Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@planet.nl> wrote:

> Don is right on the mark here. I have over the years
> used both Kodak's 
> TMax 3200, Ilford's D3200 and Fuji Neopan 1600. The
> Neopan/XTOL 
> combination gave by far the best results in terms of
> grain and tonality.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> Don Dory wrote:
> 
> > You know, you could all shoot Neopan 1600 which
> developed in Xtol at a
> > dilution of 1-3 is really a 1600 speed film with
> normal density curve.
> > 32200 is doable as a normal push at about 20%
> increase of time.  Grain is
> > fine and the tonality is still good.
> > 
> > Just my 2 cents about a really underrated film.
> > 
> > Don
> > don.dory@gmail.com
> > 
> > 
> > On 2/5/06, Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote:
> > 
> >>Matt quit while yer a head! ;-)
> >>ted
> >>Ted Grant Photography Limited
> >>1817 Feltham Road
> >>Victoria BC  V8N 2A4
> >>250-477-2156
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Matt Powell" <wooderson@gmail.com>
> >>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> >>Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 3:46 PM
> >>Subject: Re: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak
> 3200 ASA
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>On 2/5/06, Didier Ludwig
> <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>... neither Delta 3200 nor TMax 3200 is a true
> 3200-speed film.
> >>>>
> >>>>Matt
> >>>>What do you ecaxtly mean with "not a true
> 3200-speed film"?  Just
> >>>>curious.
> >>>>Didier
> >>>
> >>>However ISO is measured (I believe it's shadow
> density at
> >>>something-or-other blah blah blah, I don't do
> testing of that kind),
> >>>neither of the 3200 films is a 'true' 3200 ISO
> (as Tri-X is a true 400
> >>>in certain developers, etc.). TMZ or Delta3200 at
> 3200 is underexposed
> >>>(and then push-processed).
> >>>
> >>>This is all badly explained, I'm sure.
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>MP
> >>>wooderson@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Leica Users Group.
> >>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug
> for more information
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Leica Users Group.
> >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug
> for more information
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug
> for more information
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Almere, The Netherlands
> 
> SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS!
> 
> General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
> Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
> 
> Stock photography:
> http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
>
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
> Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com
> 
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for
> more information
> 



                
___________________________________________________________ 
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now. 
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry

In reply to: Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)