Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Not a PAW
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Feb 12 16:12:55 2006
References: <237468123721e4.23721e42374681@shaw.ca> <6.1.0.6.2.20060212160115.061e6528@192.168.100.42>

Richard,
They are not muddy, he has just put most of his histogram in the middle with
not all that much black and some whites.  Whatever he did, Greg has created
a signature look.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 2/12/06, Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote:
>
> Is it just me, or do they look a bit muddy?
>
> At 01:20 PM 2/12/2006, GREG LORENZO wrote:
>
> >My first couple attempts at scanning and presenting digital images.
> Images
> >courtesy of Tri-X, Nikon 4000, Vuescan and Photoshop CS.
> >
> >Both wide angle shots and Lug related.
> >
> >see: http://www.leica-gallery.net/gjl-1/image-91547.html
> >
> >Comments, scanning and photoshop advice welcome.
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
> use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from firkin at gexrp01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: Not a PAW)
Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Not a PAW)
In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Not a PAW)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Not a PAW)