Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Tue Feb 21 09:13:24 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org>
 
Amen.  The 2400 is what I'm looking at, too, and I plan on buying one 
once I figure out where to put it - my lightroom space is pretty 
limited at the moment.


>There are currently 1020 people subscribed to the LUG.
>I don't think more than 100 of them have /ever/ posted, and on 
>average it's the same two dozen people who do most of the posting.
>
>But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've 
>learned from this thread.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick
In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)