Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: jonathan at openhealth.org (Jonathan Borden)
Date: Tue Feb 21 13:28:41 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20060221155131.02a8a5b0@mail.rhtc.net>

  Tina Manley wrote:

> At 11:43 AM 2/21/2006, you wrote:
>
>> But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've  
>> learned from this thread.
>
> It's a great printer, unless you want to go with the massive 4800.   
> You'll actually save money in ink and paper with the 4800.

Well yes, but if you wish to save the box it is shipped in, the rent  
payments on the room needed to store it will overwhelm the money  
saved on ink  :-)) In all seriousness, when you calculate the price  
of the printer, realize that it comes with 110 ml ink cartridges and  
the actual premium of the 4800 over the price of the 2400 becomes  
much less. Regarding the size, although massive by Leica M standards  
it remains downright puny next to a Devere 1010 enlarger :-))

Jonathan

Replies: Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)