Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Tue Feb 21 14:59:04 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org>
 
I think you should too, Brian. All the advantages of new inks, able  
to print to a sensible/presentable size and, not too expensive. One  
of my following purchases.

B.

On 21-feb-2006, at 17:43, Brian Reid wrote:

> There are currently 1020 people subscribed to the LUG.
> I don't think more than 100 of them have /ever/ posted, and on  
> average it's the same two dozen people who do most of the posting.
>
> But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've  
> learned from this thread.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)