Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 50/2.8 Elmars...
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sun Feb 26 22:10:46 2006
References: <377c03c377defc.377defc377c03c@shaw.ca>

Lets not discourage him Greg. I really didn't see the problem and had
to re-read several times to convince myself that there was a problem
with which lens it was that was being referred to.

I'd say Colin's colleague can translate for him all he wants. :-)

Daniel

On 2/27/06, GREG LORENZO <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Colin J <smcj35@yahoo.com> writes in part:
>
> > >Is the 50/1.4 LTM lens a Canon lens that was
> > >made in Germany or a Leica Summilux lens in LTM?
> >
> > >I didn't know that Canon made any lenses in
> > >Germany.
> >
> >
> > Greg,
> >
> > I'm sorry.  My message was not so very clear.  I
> > should have made it clearer that I was referring
> > to the serial number of my 50mm f/2.8 Elmar-M.
> >
> > English is not my first language and I rely on my
> > partner, who is British, to turn my draft LUG
> > postings into better English than I can write
> > myself. I think something got lost in
> > translation.
> >
>
> Just don't let him translate any For Sale posts for you. Someone could get 
> upset.
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Re: 50/2.8 Elmars...)