Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Week 9 and 10
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Mon Mar 13 10:55:39 2006
References: <C03B2653.DCDA%bdcolen@comcast.net>

Hell, B.D.

If that Tri Elmar focused closed than a meter it would be the only lens 
I'd own. I could certainly work around F4 but sometimes you just gotta 
be close.

Walt

28,50.50.90. Had the 90 for about 4 years and used in maybe 5 times. 




B. D. Colen wrote:

>Or...think of the15 as a special lens for special work, and stick to
>something in the 28-50 range as a 'carry lens.'
>
>The following is not a response to your image or to you....:-)
>
>I realize this is a matter of taste, but I find in looking at posted images
>that the 15 is grossly over used. In fact, the use of the 15 reminds me of
>the faddish overuse of the fish eye back when Nikon brought it out for the
>F. 
>
>
>On 3/13/06 1:24 PM, "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Thanks B.D.,
>>
>>You're probably right about the CV15. Unfortunate it was the only wide
>>angle I had with me. Just another proof of the fact that I should never
>>leave any lens at home.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Michiel Fokkema
>>
>>
>>B. D. Colen wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Michiel - Very nice shot of your lovely daughter - and great idea to shoot
>>>her regularly at this 'elastic' age. The dining shot, however, I think is 
>>>an
>>>excellent example of when its time to put the 15 away; the perspective and
>>>distortion distract from, rather than add to the quality of the image.
>>>
>>>
>>>On 3/13/06 12:31 PM, "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hi Richard,
>>>>
>>>>I think the aperture was 5.6. If I had tipped down a bit more I would
>>>>have had a black part on the bottom of the picture because of the
>>>>darkness under the table. A 19 or 21 might have been a better lens for
>>>>this picture but I don't have one.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for looking,
>>>>
>>>>Michiel
>>>>
>>>>Richard S. Taylor wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Michiel - That's a nice portrait of your daughter.  Your project with
>>>>>her sounds like a good one.
>>>>>
>>>>>Since I've been playing with the one myself, I'm more intrigued by your
>>>>>use of the CV15 in the restaurant, though.
>>>>>
>>>>>Was it shot wide open?  Did you estimate focus on your friend?  (It
>>>>>looks like your friend and the far background is really sharp, the
>>>>>foreground less so.)  Do you think a bit more tip down to lose some of
>>>>>the ceiling would still work?
>>>>>
>>>>>Nice picture, too, by the way.  ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://michielfokkema.wordpress.com/picture-a-week-2006/week-9/
>>>>>>http://michielfokkema.wordpress.com/picture-a-week-2006/week-10/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>C&C welcome and appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Michiel Fokkema
>>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Week 9 and 10)