Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Real patriots don't take pictures
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Fri Mar 31 11:40:41 2006
References: <C052C244.EC1C%bdcolen@comcast.net>

If I seriously needed photographs of a sensitive and secret type place 
I'd have the money to bribe a CIA type.. How about your new girlfriend 
on the Subway, BD?

B. D. Colen wrote:

>Well, actually, if I seriously needed photos of a particular place, and I
>was aware of the way people are being hassled, I might well use a 4x5 on a
>tripod with a darkcloth, wearing a Tilly hat, Mephisto shoes, and a Domke
>photo vest, with a Parker 51 in one pocket , a fifth of single malt in
>another other, with a Leica IIIf hanging around my neck - because who would
>think that a 'bad guy' would be so obvious? Of course I might well have a
>digital camera of some sort inside the 4x5...:-)
>
>Seriously, the whole thing is idiotic - if someone wants these sorts of
>images, they're going to get them. Period. I'd like to see a fraction of the
>time and attention being wasted on making sure that none of us take photos
>of some run down courthouse in East Buttbleep, or the Port Authority Bus
>Terminal applied to securing chemical plants and ports. Until that's done,
>we're screwed - pure and simple.
>
>Back to working on my new website.
>
>
>On 3/31/06 11:01 AM, "bruce" <bruce@ralgo.nl> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>If that bothers you, Frank, imagine what they get-up-to from outer/
>>inner space (satellites) ................ Google, but far more
>>efficient + telephone listening etc. etc.
>>
>>B.
>>
>>On 31-mrt-2006, at 17:54, Frank Filippone wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I get hassled all the time with a 4x5 view camera.  Why would any self
>>>respecting honest to goodness no-good-nik ever use a 4x5, on a
>>>tripod, with
>>>a dark cloth, taking 10 minutes to shoot 1 piece of film of a
>>>sensitive
>>>subject?
>>>
>>>If I were a no-good-nik, I would use a digital camera from a moving
>>>car to
>>>minimize my exposure.  What is wrong with the official idiots
>>>acting as our
>>>protectors?  How many times I have been chased off shooting a
>>>public place
>>>with my 4x5, to watch some tourist go up and happy snap the same
>>>image?  Why
>>>is one more subversive looking than the other?
>>>
>>>If taking pictures is not approved of, what do our elected
>>>officials think
>>>of the thousands to millions of pictures already taken of the
>>>building?
>>>Amateur pictures, professional pictures, printed pictures,
>>>newspaper images,
>>>even building plans.... they are all public already...
>>>
>>>Maybe it speaks to the relative brightness of our officials versus the
>>>brightness of the bad guys.  I have yet to hear of a terrorist cell
>>>getting
>>>caught because they took a picture of anything.......
>>>
>>>Frank Filippone
>>>red735i@earthlink.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Real patriots don't take pictures)
Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Real patriots don't take pictures)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Real patriots don't take pictures)