Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chris, So do I, but there is no point reacting to misinformation and prejudice. All this is based on blowing up a photograph to 400% on photoshop and nitpicking, or blindly repeating what some internet guru has spouted. I never comment on Canon, because I have not used one for the last 15 years, but that does not stop others of passing on rubbish read on the internet. My view is all DSLRs produced now will give you whatever you want. The key to buying is the system you already own - or what feels right for you, and gives you the combination of features you require. Dont listen to people, go and try the various models at a shop..... Cheers Jayanand Christopher Williams wrote: >Way OT but Nikon's images are pretty useless about 400 iso? > >Come on Neal, gimme a break. I use 800 and 1600 iso every week and produce >images just fine with Nikons. > >Chris > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Neal Friedenthal" >Subject: [Leica] Re: DSLR question > > > > >>Phil, >> >>I work part time in a full service camera shop and we sell both Canon and >> >> >Nikon. Between the two, Nikon D50 or the Canon 20D, I'd definitely go with >the Canon. The Canon has an 8.2 MP > > >>CMos chip as opposed to the 6 MP CCD of the Nikon, the Canon produces very >> >> >usable low noise images up to 1600 iso where the Nikon's images are pretty >useless above 400 iso. > > > >>Neal F >> >> > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >