Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This takes me back to my high school days. Back then, if a female wore a shift, she could be suspended. If she had a belt on, it was okay, but no belt? Suspended! Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 9:14 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Was Foot Washing, Now Abrahamic Faiths At 08:20 PM 4/14/2006, you wrote: >Sorry...didn't finish...What I was trying to say is that I find it >fascinating that the same people who have no problem calling a Roman >Catholic Bishop a bigot, or intolerant for adhering to the beliefs of >his church would no more think of calling bigoted or intolerant Muslim >cleric who insist that women wear traditional head dress, or Orthodox >Jews who insist that women dress a certain way. No, I'm an equal opportunity sceptic. I think anybody who insists that women dress a certain way, except the women themselves, is bigoted and intolerant. Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information