Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Small cars
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Thu Apr 27 15:57:50 2006
References: <C077273F.67534%joseph@yao.com> <3.0.2.32.20060427172956.02ada57c@pop.infionline.net>

Ted Grant Photography Limited
1817 Feltham Road
Victoria BC  V8N 2A4
250-477-2156
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marc James Small" <msmall@aya.yale.edu>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Small cars


> At 01:55 PM 4/27/06 -0700, Ted Grant wrote:
>
>>What really tick's me off are all the oil company owners, not mentioning
>>names and executives who are laughing all the way to the bank ripping us 
>>off
>>going doing so.
>
>
> Ted
>
> First, Canada has been a lot more reasonable about opening oil fields than
> has the US in recent years, so you guys are getting wealthy of the woes in
> the US, as you are an oil-exporting nation, though I've not yet heard of
> the Dominion applying for membership in OPEC.
>
> Second, the media makes much of gross profit but ignores the reality that
> NET profit for the oil companies is not increasing.  The bif five oil
> companies own very few of their wells:  during the Carter Administration,
> the US allowed most Middle Eastern nations to nationalize their oil 
> fields,
> so that Exxon or BP or whoever has to buy oil at the price set by the
> controlling nations.  These oil comanies have to buy oil supplies to
> replace that which they have sold, so it LOOKS like they are making a 
> bunch
> of money but they are not, as they have to reinvest most of the money 
> being
> made in new oil.  Thus, they have humongeous GROSS profits but the net
> profits are not increasing and several oil companies are experiencing
> decreasing net profits.
>
> There are a slew of answers to this but they all boil down to opening new
> fields, especially those in the US and Canada such as ANWR, building a
> SHITLOAD of new refineries, taxing imported petrochemicals at a level to
> encourage domestic production and, of course, re-establishing the 
> oil-shale
> processing infrastructure built up under the Carter Administration and 
> then
> axed at the tail end of that Administration.
>
> There is more to this, but that "windfall profit" and "excess profit" 
> stuff
> is just so much BS.  The oil companies are not hurting but they are not
> making in actuality anything on the nature of what we are being told.
>
> Marc
>
> msmall@aya.yale.edu
> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


In reply to: Message from joseph at yao.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] Re: Small cars)
Message from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Re: Small cars)