Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] romanian rip-off?
From: hlritter at mindspring.com (Howard L Ritter, Jr)
Date: Wed May 10 13:15:35 2006
References: <22088094.1147267660497.JavaMail.root@centrmwml03.mgt.cox.net><82c9dd70605100644w61147d6fx7c3425f58354f460@mail.gmail.com> <324F476E-6EB3-475B-955C-ADE5E763717A@pandora.be>
 
Well, it IS a double-Gauss design!

--howard


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philippe Orlent" <philippe.orlent@pandora.be>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] romanian rip-off?


> Sounds logical. The 50 at the top of the gaussian curve :-)
> 
> 
> Op 10-mei-06, om 15:44 heeft Eric Korenman het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> Throughout the years, if you plot my lens use swings, the peak of  
>> the bell
>> curve is the 50mm focal length (with f min= 21mm,  f max= 135mm)
>>
>> Eric
Replies: Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
 In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)