Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital M Principle
From: grduprey at aol.com (grduprey@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jun 4 15:43:27 2006
References: <01d401c68756$7db1a850$6501a8c0@FrankDell2> <p06230903c0a7c5a62e07@[10.0.1.4]>

So far I'm not convinced their fairy dust is of the same caliber as the 
Solms Fairy Dust.  I'm still trying to figure out the D200, especially the 
AF thing.
 
Gene
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Graves <allen.graves@charter.net>
To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 18:04:48 -0500
Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital M Principle


I think the Nikon D200 and the Canon 5d both use some Japanese fairy dust, 
though only sparingly ... 
 
Allen 
 
>The fairy dust was the only thing that made sense to me......that >and the 
>sweat spots..... 
> 
>Frank Filippone 
>red735i@earthlink.net 
> 
> 
> 
>> M8 vs. D70... 
>> 
>> 1) Behind the right eye, rangefinder focusing can be more accurate 
>> 2) Use of M lens "sweat spots" 
>> 3) 10.3 mp 
>> 4) No AA filter 
>> 5) Next gen sensor/firmware engineering 
>> 6) Magic Solms fairy dust used everywhere except on the sensor 
>> 
>> Case closed. 
>> 
>> David W. Almy 
> 
> 
> 
>_______________________________________________ 
>Leica Users Group. 
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
 
_______________________________________________ 
Leica Users Group. 
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 

In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Digital M Principle)
Message from allen.graves at charter.net (Allen Graves) ([Leica] Digital M Principle)