Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm not going to try it tomorrow (which is 6/6/06). Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Walt Johnson Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:57 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 777 That must be why one must do all there agitation on their knees while processing in777? Christopher Williams wrote: >Is this the godly version of the 666 developer? > >Chris > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jeffery Smith" Subject: [Leica] 777 > > > > >>Well, my bags of 777 developer are sitting ready to go. I have had >>difficulty finding much information on this developer other than all >>of >> >> >the > > >>caveats (it smells, it turns sludgy, the funkier it gets, the better >>it works, etc.). >> >>Do any of you have any practical experience with this developer? I >>keep reading that "agitation is critical", but then nother is >>mentioned about just WHAT you have to do carefully when agitating. >> >>Jeffery Smith >>New Orleans, LA >> >> > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information