Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 29, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:09 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > >> Lottermoser George writes in part: >> >> >>> In an attempt to help us all avoid creating and posting "mediocre" >>> photographs; can we develop a group consensus on what constitutes a >>> mediocre photograph? (sometimes we post images which are simply >>> interesting visual notes of situations and I believe not intended >>> to be seen as anything more - I'm not dicussing about those). >>> >> >> LOL!! >> >> After we agree on what makes a great photo (might take the Lug >> collective a day or so) we can then solve that problem of some art >> being mediocre art and then move on to deciding which political >> philosopy we should ascribe to! >> >> On the other hand, never mind... I don't think it can be done. >> >> Regards, >> >> Greg >> > > For a start - > > Pictures of: Self assessment time! > > Cute kids doing cute things. guilty > Kittens, no matter how cute. not guilty > Landscapes without clouds. guilty > Anything taken with a 15 mm lens. not guilty (for want of one) > Car racing scenes without cars. not guilty > Cars racing without crashes. not guilty > Any picture of New York crowds. not guilty > Family celebrations where everyone is looking at the camera. guilty > Flowers, flowers, flowers. guilty, guilty, guilty > Seascapes. plead to lesser charge of harbors > Photos including the photographer's feet. not guilty Ric Carter http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies > Most of my pictures of any topic. > > Larry Z > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information