Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Digital image longevity
From: nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed Aug 16 13:48:53 2006
References: <200608141445.k7EEj3NT012551@server1.waverley.reid.org> <E7BF209C-C607-4133-A671-E11CFD537F3B@optonline.net> <9B3740C481538314FD0EE6B2@hindolveston.reid.org> <CA4AEDFEA9897ADFE7194E2E@scarborough.isc.org> <44E2AA6A.5000801@nathanfoto.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060816102017.026dce08@infoave.net>

Thanks Tina, I will look into that. Or perhaps I will just start using 
the Powerbook to burn the DVDs--I think it is agnostic w.r.t. plus or minus.

Nathan

Tina Manley wrote:
> At 01:17 AM 8/16/2006, you wrote:
>> Related question: how come all the archival DVD's I see are of the -R 
>> variety (like the Kodak ones on this web site)? My burner uses DVD+R 
>> discs (at least the burner I have in my desktop PC, I am not sure 
>> whether my Powerbook takes both flavors). Is there something about 
>> the minus vs. the plus that makes it easier to produce archival DVDs?
>>
>> Nathan
>
> Nathan -  My built-in DVD burner uses +R, too, so I bought an external 
> DVD burner so I could use -R.  I've read that -R is more reliable and 
> those who submit to Alamy on DVDs say that the error rate with -R is 
> much less than with +R.  I don't think I'd trust +R as much for 
> archival use.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS!

General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com

Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com

Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)