Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Walker Evans--digital reproductions
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Fri Aug 25 10:01:58 2006
References: <9b678e0608250759wd821905n1c76684731460220@mail.gmail.com> <C1149258.143A4%bd@bdcolenphoto.com>

I always felt the photographer has the first word.  Which seems more 
important then the last word anyway.

At 11:41 AM 8/25/2006, you wrote:
>Actually, I found this "pretentious twerp" quite insightful, in that he
>raises and deals with important issues. Photography is no more the "people's
>medium" than is drawing or painting - every kid draws and paints in school;
>not every kid photographs. For every talented painter or illustrator, there
>are countless thousands of hacks, as is the case with photography. But
>that's beside the point. The real questions raised and explored in the piece
>are about what photography is or isn't, and how much the original artist's
>vision should be seen as the last word, if you will, on a particular image.
>
>
>On 8/25/06 10:59 AM, "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Lee,
> > The reviewer is a pretentious twerp IMHO.  In the first paragraphs he 
> admits
> > that Walker Evans wasn't especially interested in the printing of the
> > images.  So, if a later person comes along and finds another story in the
> > images then so what? (Assuming the pedigree of the images is clearly
> > stated)  What I got out of the reviewer was angst that the actual image
> > could be gorgeous even though the content frequently was depressing.
> >
> > The truth of photography is that it is the peoples medium and the folks 
> > do
> > what they will with the images.  As a photographer, the only way to 
> > control
> > your images is to destroy the originals when you are done with them.
> > Otherwise, someone else may come along and re interpret what you did or
> > didn't do.
> >
> > If you have a problem with loss of control then take up painting, but 
> > even
> > there someone may come along a few hundred years later and "restore" the
> > painting ala the Cistine Chapel.
> >
> > 0.02
> >
> > Don
> > don.dory@gmail.com
> >
> > On 8/25/06, Lee England <Engl6914@cableone.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> An interesting article I ran into in this morning's New York Times on an
> >> exhibit of digital reproductions of Walker Evan's prints and the 
> >> problems
> >> associated with their interpretation.
> >>
> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/25/arts/design/25evan.html
> >>
> >> Lee England
> >> Natchez, Mississippi
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Chris Saganich, Sr. Physicist
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York Presbyterian Hospital
chs2018@med.cornell.edu
Ph. 212.746.6964
Fax. 212.746.4800
Office A-0049 



In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Walker Evans--digital reproductions)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Walker Evans--digital reproductions)