Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Sun Sep 3 19:20:57 2006
References: <200609031717.k83HCoBM096229@server1.waverley.reid.org><44FB44DF.6020609@telefonica.net><7.0.1.0.0.20060903142519.01c04658@telus.net> <44FB897F.40808@eth.net>

Then is the Hassy H2d a waste of $22,000? Lots of professionals do not think
so.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jayanand Govindaraj" Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs.
digital (not a debate)


> Dont you think, in the world of professional photography (Doug Herr
> excepted), that the DMR is irrelevant? If cost/benefit does not enter an
> equation, then it is just an instrument for rich amateurs to gush over
> each other, like Linn turntables or Lamborghinis - a status symbol, to
> be sold at a high price, in low quantities, to keep the cachet alive.
> Classic Hermes marketing. I have yet to read a comparision of the DMR
> with anything anywhere, either in print or online, in a non specialist
> site. A Leica rangefinder is pretty unique, a Leica SLR much less so.
> Cheers
> Jayanand Govindaraj
> Chennai, India



Replies: Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re:Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at telus.net (David Young) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))