Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That might be true (well, it certainly is) Larry, but it is only hypothetically better. An Elmar that is focused spot on will probably out perform the Rollei 35's Sonnar that has been focused by approximation. Getting the focus right has a large effect on the performance of a lens. Depth of field is no replacement for correct focus. Daniel On 9/5/06, Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin@optonline.net> wrote: > ?uis, > > ?arry the ?ollei 35 ??. ?he f2.8 40 mm ?onnar lens is > better than the 50 mm ?lmar. > > ?arry ? > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >