Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
From: wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith)
Date: Sat Sep 9 17:03:15 2006

Joseph:
   
  The 35/ 1.5 has good ratings but pricey. I wish you guys had listed the 
25/ 3.5 to make me feel better--I just bought one!!!
   
  Thanks for all the fine intell.
   
  Bill

Joseph Low <joelct@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
  Ken

Check out the Canon 35/1.5 LTM as well

Joseph / Singapore

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of
Kenneth Frazier
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 2:34 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses


On Sep 9, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Mark Langer wrote:

> 'd rate the 35/2, the 100/3.5 and the 100/2 as great lenses.

Thanks, Mark, and others, for all the good input. Sounds like I ned
to look more closely at the Canons.

Ken
-----------------------------------
The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
----------------------------------
Current Leica Photography (PESO):
http://gallery2.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/

Current Medium Format Photos:
http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn

Current Leica Photography (in move to new gallery)
http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r




_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ 
countries) for 2?/min or less.

Replies: Reply from joelct at singnet.com.sg (Joseph Low) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
In reply to: Message from joelct at singnet.com.sg (Joseph Low) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)