Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes thanks Jim we are all in agreement. My credo with photoshop is that the improvements should be undetectable while still improving the picture. Philippe identified a too heavy hand, exacerbated when it came to downsampling and resizing to a jpeg for the post version. Side by side of course, changes are more apparent. With this one I feel like I have established that you can have all the "Leica Glow" you may wish for with Photoshop's magnificent control. I never stop learning. I'm of the later can't be too sharp or too accurate Leica glass camp (love that asph latest generation). Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jim Nichols Sent: Thursday, 14 September 2006 15:20 To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] hoppys casual portrait revisited Hoppy, For what it is worth, I like the latest photo much better. It has a much more natural look, but still very flattering. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information