Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Was Leica M8 hands on: Now future Leica
From: dnaplasmid at compwrx.com (Aram Langhans#2)
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:18:11 2006
References: <200609151148.k8FBjhg7058037@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Yikes, Don.  I don't like that math.  Of course, there would be many 
parts not required in an integrated R10 digital as opposed to an R9/DMR 
combo.  Maybe that will be the saving grace.

Aram


> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:45:02 -0400
> From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Was Leica M8 hands on: Now future Leica
>       Speculation
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID:
>       <9b678e0609150445r28edb39ct96a8ad545f4541d0@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Aram,
> If Canon charges $1600 for a 50mm F1.2 and Leica charges $3400 for a
> 50mm F1
> and Canon charges $3000 for a 12MP FF and Leica charges effectively
> $7000
> for the R9/DMR(I'm sort of blending new used prices here) then your
> dreams
> will set you back $16000 to $20000. (Canon charging $7-8000 for the
> 1DsMkII)  Now you are in the realm of medium format backs which will
> not be
> much bigger.
> 
> Of course you could look at it the other way, a smaller, lighter, more
> versatile medium format camera for less money.  :)
> 
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com