Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina, in my opinion it would be well worthwhile spending some effort on. A small burn in of some of the flared area. The expressions and rim lighting, especially also of the gloved hand make it tell the story very well. Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006 01:14 To: Leica Users Group; leica@freelists.org; MUGers@yahoogroups.com; paw@micapeak.com; seephoto@micapeak.com; digitalusersgroup@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Leica] Backlight vs Flare? PESO: This is a film photo - Fuji Astia. I'm guessing that it was the R6.2 because I almost never used color in the M's. And I'm guessing it was the 60 because the only R lenses I have are the 19, 60, 100 and a couple of really long ones. I could be wrong about both of those, though. It's shot from the shadow side with bright sunlight coming in the window of a very dark room. Is the flare distracting or not? No photoshopping on this one at all. Scanned with Nikon LS5000 and it seems to suffer from being compressed for the web - jpeg-gy artifacts. Suggestions for improvements or forget it? http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/68333859 Thanks, Tina Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA http://www.tinamanley.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information