Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Square portrait (OT)
From: summicron at jam.rr.com (Frank F. Farmer)
Date: Wed Oct 11 19:49:42 2006
References: <452CDF33.8040200@dlridings.se> <452CE0EB.9000206@dlridings.se> <452D2B41.7000401@hemenway.com>
 
I agree.  The second one has more punch.

Frank Farmer
Jackson, Miss.

On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote:

> The second one, Daniel... clearly!
>
> Jim
>
> Daniel Ridings wrote:
>
>> Second try:
>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v41/06v41-0001b.jpg.html
>> I tried to put a little more zest into it. Curious to know if anyone 
>> clearly prefers the one over the other.
>> Daniel
>> Daniel Ridings wrote:
>>> It's a little too flat, but ...
>>>
>>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v41/06v41-0001.jpg.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Square portrait (OT))
Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Square portrait (OT))
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Square portrait (OT))