Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Epson RD 1 vs M8
From: cummer at netvigator.com (Howard Cummer)
Date: Sun Oct 29 18:16:57 2006
References: <200610292238.k9TMbT8k049224@server1.waverley.reid.org>

On 30 Oct 2006, at 6:38 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:

> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:23:28 +0100
> From: Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Epson R-D1 vs. M8?
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20061029215549.02e04c68@screengang.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Havent't handled the M8 so far, but I guess QC is way better. Crop  
> factor is a bit less biting though I'm getting used to it.  
> Baselength is significantly better, but lowest ISO is deceiving  
> with 160 only. Damn, Leica is famous for it's fast lenses and then  
> they offer a new camera which forces you to run into candlelighted  
> basement rooms if you want to shoot your expensive f1.4 glasses  
> wide open! Or it forces you to use NF filters which is silly.
>

Dear Didier,
Not really - don't forget that the M8 goes to 1/8000 / sec which  
means you can shoot wide open sooner with a higher shutter speed.
Cheers
Howard (in HK)

Replies: Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Epson RD 1 vs M8)