Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Now round, was M8 and the Future
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Wed Nov 1 14:01:39 2006
References: <001d01c6fa88$015aec30$6601a8c0@dcpdc.dcts.org> <20061031010312.83527.qmail@web50106.mail.yahoo.com> <22c93b290610301706ycede2f3w654b7bb5c1651445@mail.gmail.com> <45475049.2090607@waltjohnson.com> <45476D00.1040005@dlridings.se> <00d901c6fd0b$26938ef0$26c89253@Korhonen> <45478067.1040000@waltjohnson.com> <4549115A.4000903@hemenway.com>

Help..I'm dizzy and I can't get up :-)

Jim Hemenway wrote:

> Walt:
>
> Rectangular and square are fine, but the best format is really round!
>
> http://www.half-fast.com/ArsatGrafex-Oct2006/
>
> Round rules... round rocks!  ;-)
>
> Jim
>
> Walt Johnson wrote:
>
>> There is no doubt the Rolliflex viewfinder makes looking a pleasure. 
>> There seems to be a distancing from the equipment that allows more 
>> subject involvement. I feel the same way with a viewfinder and prefer 
>> them over slrs. Although Daniel sent us some really fine images some 
>> could be made more effective by cropping. This is, of course, a 
>> personal thing but the image subject should visually dominate?
>>
>> Walt
>>
>> Raimo K wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Daniel.
>>> It depends, though... my very first camera was a simple Yashica A 
>>> TLR and now when I photograph with my Rolleiflex 3.5F all things 
>>> seem to compose themselves on the groundglass.
>>> All the best!
>>> Raimo K
>>> Personal photography homepage at:
>>> http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlr@dlridings.se>
>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:34 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 and the Future
>>>
>>>
>>>> Walt Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Very few square photographs appear well composed to me. I'd go 6x9 
>>>>> and be fine.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I beg your pardon:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v22/06v22-0011.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v13/06v13-0001.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v15/06v15-0039.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/informal/04v16-0028a-65429.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/informal/04v10-61939.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/informal/22-37338.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/informal/v26-0012-47928.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/informal/merna-sandy-37312.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/informal/23-37335.jpg.html
>>>> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/nyeve2006/05v52-0015.jpg.html 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Now round, was M8 and the Future)
In reply to: Message from rclark01 at comcast.net (Robert Clark) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from rhaightjr at yahoo.com (Bob Haight) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Now round, was M8 and the Future)