Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doug Herr offered: Subject: RE: [Leica] Just Tried an M8 >>and the extremely low cost of mistakes means I'm much more likely to push >>the >button when the gut says "NOW" instead of the moment's hesitation when the >brain is thinking of the cost of processing.<<<< Hi Doug, For some years I've shot one of my grandson's basketball games a couple of times a week, school and night league, never a thought about film and processing even though some evenings I blow a dozen rolls or more shooting the action. Then I became aware of film/processing costs building up each week while I had all this fun. :-) Then I tried holding back, not shooting as much, too some degree due to she who must be obeyed bringing the cost factor to the table. It doesn't work! Holding back while thinking about " basketball action" is ridiculous as it's a non thought process, it's see-shoot! Try to think and the game is almost over. Now shooting digital it's a piece of cake as there isn't any thought process cluttering the mind, it's strictly see- shoot! And nary a penny spent.... well OK the paper cost when making prints for the G-son. :-) That's not a cost factor, it's an investment factor of encouragement for his future as an athlete. :-) Good excuse any way. :-) But if nothing else, digital certainly for a heavy duty shooter of film, digital is the most economical way to go regardless of the extra gear, computer, printer etc. In the end one can actually save money in the long run. Obviously for the one or two roll a week or month user it's hardly worth the digital cost. ted