Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Luminosity
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)
Date: Wed Nov 8 18:04:43 2006

I don't know..., but for me Ektar looks better

Saludos desde Barcelona
Luis

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
Jim Hemenway
Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 08 de noviembre de 2006 21:55
Para: LUG
Asunto: [Leica] Luminosity

I hope that you'll like the luminosity in most of these taken with my 
spare R8 prior to selling it to a member of this group:
http://www.half-fast.com//R8-Ektar25-Oct9-13-2006/
Ektar 25 color negative film

As a comparison, these (posted earlier) were taken about the same time
with Kodachrome 200 in a Pentax MX:
http://www.half-fast.com/MX-Kodachrome-Oct8-10-2006/

I've been told by someone on the Kodachrome list that Kodak High
Resolution" film is actually Ektar 400... can anyone here confirm?

Comments are cheerfully accepted!

Jim

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Luminosity)
In reply to: Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Luminosity)