Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina, that's an informative sample. Both seem to have done a creditable job, on casual observation. The capture one example is clearly more saturated. The white point that you have set in each is very close to the other, that is, little apparent cast. The acr example looks actually to be a more pleasing (natural?) rendition to me. For me, the ACR seems an attractive option in that there is great integration for photoshop users. I have no experience with any other however. Thanks so much for sharing all of this stuff. Many LUG members are learning a great deal from your posts so far. Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2006 12:57 To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Capture One with M8 At 09:16 PM 11/8/2006, you wrote: >I played around with a DNG one of the reviews had. Used Adobe Raw >Converter, and I think it did just fine. I'd be interested in seeing >side-by-side of capture one vs. Adobe's. Not just the auto setting, but by >tweaking each. >-- >Eric Here you go. This one is converted with ACR: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/69929949 White balance on the sail. And this one with Capture One: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/69929981 White balance on the sail. What do you think? Tina Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA http://www.tinamanley.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information