Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Wed Nov 8 21:40:54 2006

Doug obviously absolutely worth the effort, as you have shown. A pretty 
tough subject to expose well, in this instance.
Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Douglas Herr
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2006 13:20
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] 2500 ISO


On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Ted Grant wrote:

> A sort of point. You may re-call a few weeks ago I had several 
> photographs
> sold for $750.00 each. A couple more have gone since, one of them a 
> 13X19
> flower picture shot with a 20D and Leica 80mm 1.4 lens and everything 
> set on
> automatic! :-) Just look through viewfinder, focus and go "click!" So 
> maybe
> you might understand why I have so much difficulty dealing with all the
> technical stuff.

IMHO, the automatic settings will do fine 90% to 95% or even 98% of the 
time. The technical tweaking is for those of us who are anal about the 
last 2%. of the time.

for this photo
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/artiodactyls/dash01.html


it was paying attention to the details that kept the details in the 
whitest areas of the animal's coat.  The detail isn't all that visible 
on the monitor but on an RA4 print it's all there.  Would this have 
been as good a picture if the top of the muzzle were blown out?  
Perhaps to some people it would be but not to me.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)