Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: eyeball calibration (was: RE: PS Re: [Leica] DMR DNG profile hell!)
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Tue Nov 14 16:13:45 2006

Here you go, Doug, here's the profile page from you lab. That lab looks 
fantastic. I wish it was here
http://www.westcoastimaging.com/wci/page/info/FAQ/uploadfaq/profiles.html


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
G Hopkinson
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2006 10:03
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: eyeball calibration (was: RE: PS Re: [Leica] DMR DNG profile 
hell!)

Well Doug, we all know that your end results in print are superb. This 
sounds like a lot of work to get to that point. If you are
using one lab that is printing digitally (and of course they almost all are) 
they could provide you with a profile for their setup.
Assuming you had a calibrated monitor and colour management in place, you 
could install their profile to use for soft proofing. Then
you should see on your calibrated screen what their output should look like 
(within the limitations of the different devices). For
example I have a lab offering Fuji output from a prepared digital file which 
is extremely cheap. They have set up info available.
They suggest conversion to sRGB (closest to the gamut of their machines) and 
they provide a profile. If you found that with this set
up, there was a further adjustment, it ought to be consistent and you could 
routinely apply that correction. Really though, this
methods should get you very close.
Drop me a line if I'm not making sense.
Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
telyt@earthlink.net
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2006 09:49
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: eyeball calibration (was: RE: PS Re: [Leica] DMR DNG profile hell !)

G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> What were the problems for you, Doug and Brian, that
> caused you to abandon the Spyders?

After calibrating the monitor with the Spyder, prints from a known
calibrated printer (the LightJet used by West Coast Imaging, which I
believe was Calypso's LightJet) were much too dark and contrasty.

My procedure now is to do a rough calibration using only Adobe Gamma,
adjust the file in Photoshop the way I want it, then send the file to a lab
with a calibrated printer.  Once I get the print back I open the file in
Photoshop, open Adobe Gamma at the same time, then adjust the monitor's
calibration (with Adobe Gamma) to make the PS image of the file look like
the print.  Assuming the initial calibration isn't quite right, I can then
tweak the photo the way I want it with Photoshop.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .




_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Vuescan and Nikon ED 5000 woes again)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) (eyeball calibration (was: RE: PS Re: [Leica] DMR DNG profile hell !))