Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today(ChrisWillliams)
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Fri Nov 17 16:50:25 2006
References: <002c01c70aa9$7f4be6e0$4d45e344@GATEWAY>

I'd love one if it could focus as close as my 50mm Smmicron.I'm not 
looking for macro work, just being able to use a wide angle as it should 
be used.

Walt

Jeffery Smith wrote:

>I'm surprised that the Tri-Elmar is not as coveted as I seem to covet it. I
>have gotten some fabulous results from mine.
>
>Jeffery Smith
>New Orleans, LA
>http://www.400tx.com
>http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Henning
>Wulff
>Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 5:08 PM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value
>today(ChrisWillliams)
>
>
>At 8:48 AM +1000 11/18/06, G Hopkinson wrote:
>  
>
>>Tina he's been forced from the TRUE PATH by circumstance. All of the
>>M lenses are primes. By far the most DSLR lenses are zooms.
>>Cheers
>>Hoppy
>>    
>>
>
>The Tri-Elmars are Tri-primes? :-)
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today(ChrisWillliams))
Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today(ChrisWillliams))
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today(ChrisWillliams))