Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I *HAD* some Pyrocat HD, but tossed it because it was two years old and one of the two plastic bottles was collapsing. I hate doing a *test* run on something with a confounding variable such as dead developer to mess up the conclusions. But I am ordering from PF tomorrow, so I'll give it a try. Thanks! Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com http://400tx.blogspot.com/ -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Craig Schroeder Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 8:30 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Agfa APX 400 I only had a small amount of this film left when I first tried PyroCat HD. From the limited sampling that I tried, it was the nicest combination that I recall using with Agfa 400. It also scanned nicer than other, non-staining developers that I had used with the film. They were very easy to print negatives with good shadow detail and the highlights printed nicely, too. Jeffery Smith wrote: > I have a pile of Agfa 400 and cannot find a good film/developer > combination for it. Any of you have a favorite developer for this > film? So far, most developers really leave it grainy, and the one that > didn't (Rollei Low Speed > developer) left it pretty grainless and pretty resolutionless. > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information