Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Rossella Scanned (correct URL)
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Jan 3 13:58:26 2007
References: <B6C52463-9558-413F-B810-67F737B82B22@comcast.net>

Yep. The 2nd one is a whole lot better: better crop, lovely olivey  
tone an bit more contrast tha   t makes the lighter tones come out better.
Thanks for showing,
Philippe



Op 3-jan-07, om 04:55 heeft Jesse Hellman het volgende geschreven:

> I am learning how to scan a negative, thanks to help and
> encouragement here. The photograph of Rossella Sborzacchi on page 5
> of my Spoleto pictures looked harsher than the original print, from
> which it was scanned. So now, next to it, is Rossella scanned from
> the negative in glorious 32 bit color, contrast adjusted in levels,
> burned in using the sponge burn-in tool, and sharpened. It looks to
> me closer to the smoothness and depth of the original print, at least
> on my monitor. I am eager to hear any and all opinions. The picture
> is Tri-X, F/1/4 at 1/60 sec.
>
> Current image:
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jesse+Hellman/Spoleto+2006/ 
> ViaggiatoriRossellaTruccata72.jpg.html>
>
> New scanned image, correct URL:
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jesse+Hellman/Spoleto+2006/ 
> Rossella002a72.jpg.html>
>
> Jesse
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from hellman at comcast.net (Jesse Hellman) ([Leica] IMG: Rossella Scanned (correct URL))